Web Page Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Score
5 or 4
3 or 2
1 or 0
Ideas and Content
  • Information is accurate and current
  • Ideas come mainly from primary sources
  • Authors show knowledge and insight
  • Effective use of technology demonstrated
  • All information relates to the overall purpose
  • Information not always clear
  • Primary source use is not always clear
  • Content connections not always clear
  • Does not relate content to larger context
  • No way to check validity of information
  • Strong purpose not demonstrated
  • Information incomplete or inaccurate
  • Information not from primary sources
  • Little or no overall context for information
  • Value of information is unclear
  • No way to check validity of information
  • Lacks sense of purpose or central theme
Score
5 or 4
3 or 2
1 or 0
Organization
  • Inviting opening page draws the visitor inside
  • Details are logical and effective
  • Layout of pages provides good direction
  • How to explore an idea is clear
  • Each page begins with a clear transition
  • Easy to navigate through the pages
  • Inconsistent structure of pages
  • Sequencing is inconsistent
  • Some pages incomplete
  • Some links disjointed; lack purpose
  • Unclear connections among sections
  • Sense of being lost or unsure navigating
  • No orientation for visitors
  • Sequencing unclear
  • Pages lack closure
  • No focus for links
  • Pages are inconsistent
  • Difficult to navigate in an organized way
Score
5 or 4
3 or 2
1 or 0
Language and Conventions
  • Organizational structure is clear and coherent
  • Grammar and usage are correct
  • Punctuation is accurate
  • Spelling is generally correct
  • Site needs little or no editing
  • Long or incomplete paragraphs
  • Minor problems with grammar or usage
  • Internal punctuation sometimes missing or wrong
  • Spelling is usually correct
  • Site needs some editing
  • Paragraph structure is missing
  • Errors in grammar or usage noticeable
  • Many punctuation mistakes
  • Frequent spelling errors
  • Site needs extensive editing
Score
5 or 4
3 or 2
1 or 0
Presentation
  • Web site is clearly identified; easy to find
  • The layout is clear and easy to follow
  • Backgrounds and text work well together
  • Graphical elements are used consistently
  • Multimedia adds to the main purpose
  • Links are appropriate
  • Web site easy to find
  • Layout of most pages is easy to follow
  • Backgrounds are text were not effective
  • Inconsistent or inappropriate graphics
  • Multimedia sometimes doesn't add
  • Use of links is unclear
  • Web site hard to find
  • Layout is confusing or inappropriate
  • Backgrounds and text not effective
  • Graphics only decorative or confusing
  • Multimedia unrelated to the topic
  • Too many unrelated links, or too few links
Score
5 or 4
3 or 2
1 or 0
Technical
  • Links work properly
  • Graphics are optimized
  • Works in all browsers
  • Works in text only mode
  • Multimedia resources work properly
  • Not all links work properly
  • Graphics are generally optimized
  • Pages don't work in all browsers
  • Text-only mode could be improved
  • Multimedia resources work most of the time
  • Links don't work properly
  • Graphic elements not optimized
  • Specific browsers needed
  • Text only mode does not work
  • Resources fail to work
Score
5 or 4
3 or 2
1 or 0
Contact 
  • Contact person is stated with their e-mail address.
  • States the name of the company.
  • Only contact or only e-mail address is states.
  • No contact or e-mail address is present.
  • The name of the company is not stated.

 

26-30 A Excellent

20-25 B Good

15-19 C Fair

0-14 Not exceptable. Redo